UNDERVALUED STOCKS

VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

Checking

Updated June 2026 · Top 500 undervalued stocks

Best Undervalued Stocks 2026, Ranked by Value

Undervalued stocks ranked by valuation, quality, earnings quality, financial strength, and conservative investment.

This undervalued stock screener starts from the Liquid North Atlantic universe, then applies a custom value ranking system with quality and balance-sheet controls. The simulated strategy uses market-cap dynamic weights, a 500-stock target, and 26-week rebalances against Russell 1000 Value (IWD:USA).

For research and educational purposes only · Not financial advice

Valuation50%Quality20%Earnings Quality15%Financial Strength10%Investment5%

Undervalued Stocks Ranked by Value

Top 500 stocks in the ranking

Hide small caps (under $2B)

As of 2026-06-20

Rank	Ticker	Company	MCap	Value	Quality	Earn Qual	Strength	Invest	Score
01	CRCT	Cricut, Inc.	$949M	96.7	95.5	94.5	98.8	94.1	99.99
02	NRDS	NerdWallet, Inc.	$560M	99.8	84.8	92.5	95.3	86.7	99.97
03	G5EN	G5 Entertainment AB	$52M	99.3	78.0	98.7	97.3	87.6	99.96
04	SOFAF	Socfinaf SA	$529M	95.2	95.8	96.4	86.6	70.4	99.95
05	SIP	SIPEF SA	$1.1B	95.5	97.8	78.6	98.2	87.9	99.93
06	ACSO	accesso Technology Group Plc	$138M	99.0	84.7	84.2	93.6	93.5	99.92
07	CEK	CeoTronics AG	$87M	93.6	89.4	98.7	81.9	96.1	99.91
08	DR	Medical Facilities Corp.	$231M	97.9	94.3	78.9	83.2	86.9	99.89
09	HUG	Huuuge, Inc.	$234M	99.9	93.0	57.8	95.9	95.4	99.88
10	TRUE.B	Truecaller AB	$455M	93.5	90.5	80.4	92.8	95.8	99.86
11	TFI	Télévision Française 1 SA	$1.7B	99.7	78.9	81.7	87.0	79.3	99.85
12	BWLP	BW LPG Ltd.	$2.7B	98.6	97.4	70.7	74.5	72.1	99.84
13	ETL	Eurotel SA	$27M	99.1	71.0	99.8	92.8	47.1	99.82
14	WTN	Wittchen SA	$70M	93.7	88.8	98.2	73.1	72.6	99.81
15	MXC	Mexco Energy Corp.	$16M	93.7	82.9	96.2	99.2	48.5	99.80
16	FVRR	Fiverr International Ltd.	$383M	99.5	69.4	84.2	90.0	97.6	99.78
17	TUPRS.E	Turkiye Petrol Rafinerileri AS	$9.4B	99.2	95.1	83.0	83.9	11.4	99.77
18	VEI	Veidekke ASA	$2.6B	89.6	96.3	92.5	94.9	50.9	99.76
19	KGN	Zespol Elektrocieplowni Wroclawskich Kogeneracja SA	$289M	98.0	84.9	90.4	92.0	24.5	99.74
20	FGP	FirstGroup Plc	$1.4B	99.6	82.6	98.1	38.7	96.5	99.73

1-20 of 500

Bucket Distribution

Universe-adjusted annualized return by rank bucket. The zero line is the average return across the ranked universe.

Universe

7.6%

Benchmark

+0.9%

Top

+4.7%

Value vs Quality

Each flag is a ranked stock at its listing country. Larger flags rank higher overall; the dashed lines mark the group averages.

X axis

Y axis

Biggest Movers

As of 2026-06-20

Stocks with the biggest ranking moves since the previous refresh.

Rank	Ticker	Name	Change	Score
+84	XXXX	Sample Gainer 1	#94->#10	87.7
+135	XXXX	Sample Gainer 2	#152->#17	90.5
+114	XXXX	Sample Gainer 3	#138->#24	91.8
+97	XXXX	Sample Gainer 4	#128->#31	87.2
+80	XXXX	Sample Gainer 5	#118->#38	90.3
+91	XXXX	Sample Gainer 6	#136->#45	92.6
+38	XXXX	Sample Gainer 7	#90->#52	89.7
+72	XXXX	Sample Gainer 8	#131->#59	87.5
+53	XXXX	Sample Gainer 9	#119->#66	96.6
+82	XXXX	Sample Gainer 10	#155->#73	87.5

Rank	Ticker	Name	Change	Score
-32	XXXX	Sample Decliner 1	#15->#47	91.8
-53	XXXX	Sample Decliner 2	#24->#77	95.4
-38	XXXX	Sample Decliner 3	#33->#71	97
-84	XXXX	Sample Decliner 4	#42->#126	98
-116	XXXX	Sample Decliner 5	#51->#167	97.9
-99	XXXX	Sample Decliner 6	#60->#159	95
-26	XXXX	Sample Decliner 7	#69->#95	95.3
-21	XXXX	Sample Decliner 8	#78->#99	84.9
-85	XXXX	Sample Decliner 9	#87->#172	91.5
-37	XXXX	Sample Decliner 10	#96->#133	96.7

★ Members Only ★

See the biggest movers

The biggest rank changes between published snapshots are free for members. Log in or create a free account to unlock them.

Backtested Strategy

Current Holdings

Ticker	Company	Weight	Gain/Loss	Score
XXXX	Sample Holding 1	0.95%	-42.74%	90.60
XXXX	Sample Holding 2	0.91%	-52.47%	59.40
XXXX	Sample Holding 3	0.84%	+101.26%	58.90
XXXX	Sample Holding 4	0.85%	-33.24%	90.90
XXXX	Sample Holding 5	0.86%	-35.67%	61.40
XXXX	Sample Holding 6	0.94%	+72.66%	68.40
XXXX	Sample Holding 7	0.87%	+127.94%	63.70
XXXX	Sample Holding 8	0.82%	+70.80%	84.80
XXXX	Sample Holding 9	0.87%	+137.56%	74.70
XXXX	Sample Holding 10	0.88%	+114.78%	87.60
XXXX	Sample Holding 11	0.89%	+39.10%	91.80
XXXX	Sample Holding 12	0.88%	+125.70%	85.90
XXXX	Sample Holding 13	0.80%	+38.63%	93.10
XXXX	Sample Holding 14	0.84%	-6.67%	77.70
XXXX	Sample Holding 15	0.83%	+73.69%	91.40
XXXX	Sample Holding 16	0.82%	+41.67%	70.80
XXXX	Sample Holding 17	0.84%	+25.62%	93.50
XXXX	Sample Holding 18	0.82%	-68.39%	85.20
XXXX	Sample Holding 19	0.88%	+121.04%	95.60
XXXX	Sample Holding 20	0.87%	+129.56%	81.30

Members Only

1-20 of 500

Growth of $100,000.00

01/2006 - 06/2026

Annualized Return: 10.23%
Sharpe Ratio: 0.61
Sortino Ratio: 0.81
Max Drawdown: -49.75%
Alpha: 2.24%
Beta: 0.94

General Info

Period: 2006-01-01 - 2026-06-22
Benchmark: Russell 1000 Value (IWD:USA)
Universe: Liquid North Atlantic
Number of Positions: 500
Rebalance Frequency: Every 26 Weeks
Annual Turnover: 15.27%(~76 trades/yr)
Overall Winners: (1,395/2,410) 57.88%
Correlation to Benchmark: 0.93

Performance by Calendar Year

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026**

Model

-3.87

+16.86

+24.11

-8.12

+21.83

+0.97

+21.48

-12.70

+25.40

+14.95

+19.89

+4.12

Bench

-3.97

+17.26

+13.44

-8.44

+26.12

+2.73

+24.95

-7.75

+11.34

+14.17

+15.67

+15.94

Excess

+0.10

-0.40

+10.67

+0.32

-4.29

-1.76

-3.47

-4.96

+14.06

+0.78

+4.22

-11.82

Positive returnNegative return

* from 01/02/06·** to 06/19/26

Advanced Metrics

Information Ratio: 0.13
Calmar Ratio: 0.21
Volatility: 15.73%
Ulcer Index: 10.54%

Recent Trades

As of 2026-06-22

The most recent simulated buys and sells from the latest rebalances.

Type	Ticker	Date	Age	Value	Weight
Buy	XXXX	Jun 15	7d	$27.5K	0.3%
Buy	XXXX	Jun 8	14d	$161.9K	0.8%
Buy	XXXX	Jun 1	21d	$126K	2.3%
Buy	XXXX	May 25	28d	$52.1K	2.6%
Buy	XXXX	May 18	1mo	$109.2K	3.0%
Buy	XXXX	May 11	1mo	$110.7K	1.7%
Buy	XXXX	May 4	2mo	$36.8K	2.1%
Buy	XXXX	Apr 27	2mo	$146.9K	3.0%
Buy	XXXX	Apr 20	2mo	$138.5K	1.9%
Buy	XXXX	Apr 13	2mo	$76.1K	1.7%

Type	Ticker	Date	Age	Value	Weight	Return
Sell	XXXX	Jun 15	7d	$301K	1.0%	+28%
Sell	XXXX	Jun 8	14d	$115.8K	1.7%	+55%
Sell	XXXX	Jun 1	21d	$104.6K	3.0%	+13%
Sell	XXXX	May 25	28d	$16.5K	0.8%	+3.7%
Sell	XXXX	May 18	1mo	$21.7K	1.0%	+11%
Sell	XXXX	May 11	1mo	$192.7K	1.0%	-10%
Sell	XXXX	May 4	2mo	$167.5K	0.4%	-21%
Sell	XXXX	Apr 27	2mo	$175K	1.4%	+7.7%
Sell	XXXX	Apr 20	2mo	$6.8K	0.7%	-23%
Sell	XXXX	Apr 13	2mo	$98.9K	0.6%	-17%

★ Members Only ★

See the latest trades

The simulated buys and sells from the latest rebalances are free for members. Log in or create a free account to unlock them.

Currency: USD
Sizing: Variable weights
Weighting: Company size
Positions: 500
Reconstitution: Every 26 weeks
Rebalance: Every 26 weeks

Universe

This ranking uses the Liquid North Atlantic universe, so the list starts from liquid North American and Atlantic-market stocks that are easier to trade than thin or restricted names.

Position Sizing

The portfolio targets 500 positions with dynamic market-cap weights. The result is closer to a custom value index than a concentrated stock-picking portfolio.

Buying and Selling

The strategy buys stocks with rank 90 or higher, market cap above $500 million, and price above $5. It sells once a holding falls below rank 60 or the price drops below $3, and it does not allow immediate buyback.

Trading Costs

Trades fill at the next bar's average price, with $0.005 per share commission, variable slippage, and no management fee. The strategy reconstitutes and rebalances every 26 weeks against the Russell 1000 Value benchmark.

About these models

These are illustrative backtests, not portfolios to copy. They show how a hypothetical strategy built on the ranking might have behaved after rebalancing rules, trading costs, timing, and position sizing are layered on top. Results are not actual trading returns, not investment advice, and do not guarantee future performance. We validate that each ranking can sort stocks within its universe in a historically useful way, but a good ranking can still lead to better or worse outcomes once it becomes a tradable model.

Each stock is scored 0 to 100 across valuation, quality at a reasonable price, earnings quality, financial strength, and conservative investment. Higher block scores are better, and the final score is their weighted blend.

Ranking System

Every stock in the universe is scored 0 to 100 across five composites: multi-measure valuation, quality at a reasonable price, earnings quality, financial strength, and conservative investment. The weighted total drives the final rank.

Valuation50%Quality20%Earnings Quality15%Financial Strength10%Investment5%

Multi Measure Valuation50% weight

How cheap the company looks across earnings and cash-flow yields, asset and sales multiples, shareholder yield, and dividend yield.

Earnings Yield
Free Cash Flow Yield
EBITDA Yield
Operating Income Yield

Quality At A Reasonable Price20% weight

Whether valuation is paired with durable profitability and fundamental strength instead of pure cheapness.

5Y Return on Investment
TTM Return on Investment
5Y Gross Margin
5Y Operating Margin

Earnings Quality15% weight

Whether reported earnings are supported by cash flow and lower accrual/manipulation-risk signals.

Accruals to Assets
Operating Cash Flow to Net Income
Beneish M-Score

Financial Strength10% weight

Whether the company has lower leverage, better interest coverage, and stronger distress-avoidance scores.

Debt to Capital
Debt to Assets
Interest Coverage
Altman Z Non-Manufacturing

Conservative Investment5% weight

Prefers companies with lower total asset growth to avoid aggressive balance-sheet expansion.

Total Asset Growth

Undervalued Stocks FAQ

What are the best undervalued stocks right now?

The ranking highlights undervalued stocks from the latest published strategy snapshot. Treat it as a research shortlist, not a buy list.

How does this undervalued stock screener work?

Each stock receives a 0 to 100 score across multi-measure valuation, quality at a reasonable price, earnings quality, financial strength, and conservative investment. The final rank blends those blocks into one value score.

Are low P/E stocks always undervalued?

No. A low P/E can signal cheapness, but it can also reflect falling earnings, financial stress, cyclicality, or a weak business. This model uses several valuation measures, then adds profitability, earnings-quality, leverage, and investment-discipline checks.

Are these undervalued stocks to buy?

No. This page is for research and education only. Use the ranking as a starting point for deeper due diligence, risk review, position sizing, and your own investment process.

How often is the undervalued stocks ranking updated?

The simulated strategy reconstitutes and rebalances every 26 weeks. Check the as-of date above the table to see how current the listed stocks are.

How is this different from the Russell 1000 Value benchmark?

The simulated strategy follows a value-index-like construction with dynamic market-cap weights, but it starts from the broader Liquid North Atlantic universe, uses Find My Moat's custom undervalued-stocks ranking system, and follows a semiannual rebalance schedule.

More Rankings & Systems

Quality investing

Quality Stocks

A broad quality ranking focused on profitability, margins, free cash flow quality, durability, solvency, and accounting quality.

Dividend quality

Dividend Stocks

A complementary ranking focused on payout safety, dividend growth, balance sheet strength, and valuation.

Defensive resilience

Defensive Stocks

A ranking focused on stable fundamentals, lower downside risk, cash flow quality, and balance sheet resilience.

Feedback

Spot something confusing, stale, or worth improving? Send feedback on the ranking, strategy assumptions, holdings table, or explanation.

Research & Backtest Disclaimer

These rankings are research shortlists, not investment advice, personalized recommendations, or offers to buy or sell securities. They do not account for your objectives, risk tolerance, taxes, time horizon, portfolio, or personal financial situation.

Backtests and simulations are historical models, not live results or guarantees of future performance. Data, assumptions, transaction costs, liquidity, turnover, taxes, and implementation can materially change actual outcomes. Verify current company data and do your own due diligence before making any investment decision.